As posted on the main site, a US court case has ordered a suspect to decrypt the contents of this Hard Drive.
“In a ruling issued last month, US District Judge William Sessions in Vermont ruled criminal defendant Sebastien Boucher does not have a constitutional right to keep the files encrypted. The ruling reversed an earlier decision by a federal magistrate that said forcing Boucher to enter his password into his laptop would violate his Fifth-Amendment rights against self incrimination.”
I think this is a tricky one, because assuming this guy has been upto no good he deserves to be banged up, but how will this impact Joe Public in the future, and in countries outside the US? So we are all about best practice and encrypt and secure our data as we dont want to share it with the masses, but we can be ordered to give up this information? I am not a legal expert, but I am not sure how this applies to other similar scenarios, such as items locked in a safe or lock box, can courts demand access with a warrant.
Be interesting to see how this develops, this could be similar to having to surrender your items at US airports, and the music and film industry looking for ISPs to track and report all activity. I can see the pros and the cons, and of course we would all agree to it helping to catch the bad guys, but we dont want every bit of our lives being a free for all.
One thing is for sure, big brother exists and hes getting bigger.